Malawi’s Election Dilemma: Trapped in a Cycle of Recycled Leaders?
Malawi’s upcoming elections in September will be one of the most consequential in its history. Yet, despite growing discontent with the current administration, Malawians are left with a frustratingly familiar choice—bringing back a former leader they once rejected or sticking with an incumbent who has failed to deliver.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40715/40715250d83379f53f08959b2592f3d495625c0f" alt=""
President Lazarus Chakwera, who came to power in 2020 as a symbol of hope following the infamous “Tipex elections,” now finds himself at the center of disappointment. His administration, once praised for its democratic reforms, has been marred by economic decline, corruption scandals, and broken promises. Meanwhile, former president Peter Mutharika, whom Malawians voted out in a court-ordered re-run, is plotting his return.
With the country facing a leadership vacuum, the 2025 election is more than a contest for power—it is a test of Malawi’s democracy and the people’s demand for accountability.
The Rise and Fall of Chakwera: From Hope to Disillusionment
When Chakwera took office, his promise to create a thriving economy and tackle youth unemployment—including an ambitious pledge to generate one million jobs—resonated with a struggling nation. The international community initially embraced him as a reformist leader, hopeful that he would dismantle corruption networks and restore integrity to government.
But those hopes have faded. Instead of expanding economic opportunities, the government has sent Malawian youths to work on farms in Israel under controversial labor agreements—criticized as exploitative and even labeled by some as modern-day slavery.
Rather than breaking away from past failures, Chakwera’s administration has repeated the mistakes of its predecessors: rampant corruption, wasteful expenditure, nepotism, and a preference for self-promotion over real governance. The Catholic Church, an influential voice in Malawi, has publicly condemned his government for financial mismanagement, failed economic policies, and an impending hunger crisis—especially in the wake of Cyclone Freddy, where state relief efforts fell woefully short.
The Return of Mutharika: A Desperate Gamble?
Frustrated by Chakwera’s failures, many Malawians are now considering giving Peter Mutharika another chance—a leader they rejected in 2020 for mismanaging the economy, tolerating corruption, and enabling nepotism.
Recent Afrobarometer survey results paint a stark picture: 76% of Malawians believe the country is heading in the wrong direction. If elections were held today, 43% of respondents would vote for Mutharika’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), compared to 29% for the ruling Malawi Congress Party (MCP).
But does Mutharika truly offer a better alternative, or is Malawi simply caught in a cycle of recycling leaders who have already failed?
Economic Decline: A Nation in Crisis
A snapshot of Malawi’s economic landscape reveals deep distress:
- Fertilizer prices have surged by 250%, maize prices by 50%, sugar by 30%, and bread by 40%.
- Transportation costs have jumped 60%, driving up the overall cost of living by 50%.
- The devaluation of the kwacha has worsened the foreign exchange crisis, making imports painfully expensive.
- Fuel shortages have become routine, disrupting businesses and daily life.
Malawi has also struggled with basic services. A severe shortage of passport booklets forced the government to halt passport printing, while travel restrictions were imposed on officials to cut costs. The U.S. government’s recent decision to withdraw USAID funding has further strained an economy heavily reliant on foreign aid.
Yet, in the face of these challenges, Chakwera has gained a reputation as a “traveling president,” frequently embarking on expensive foreign trips—sometimes accompanied by family members. One of the most widely ridiculed moments came when he flew to London to attend a virtual conference, reinforcing public frustration over government waste.
The Leadership Vacuum: Who Can Fill the Gap?
For many Malawians, the late Vice President Saulos Chilima was the only promising alternative. But his unexpected death has left voters with limited options.
New political figures like Dalitso Kabambe and Michael Usi have failed to inspire widespread confidence, leaving many feeling trapped between two unappealing choices: an underperforming incumbent or a familiar but flawed former leader.
As philosopher Joseph de Maistre once said, “Every nation gets the government it deserves.” But do Malawians truly deserve this never-ending cycle of failed leadership?
A Call for Real Change
Chakwera’s recent State of the Nation Address (SONA) was a missed opportunity to provide solutions. While some praised his district-focused approach, many saw it as a thinly veiled campaign speech rather than a strategic roadmap to fix Malawi’s problems.
Instead of concrete plans to stabilize the economy, curb corruption, and resolve fuel shortages, Chakwera appeared more interested in defending his record and attacking the opposition.
With 84% of Malawians saying they will “definitely” vote in the upcoming election, public engagement is at an all-time high. But as they head to the polls, the question remains: Will Malawi choose real change, or will it continue the cycle of recycled leaders?
Follow and Subscribe Nyasa TV :